Jak vybrat vhodné PC? Prosím o radu

Napsal domain;887217

uz jsi dnes defragmentoval?

Napsal domain;887217

s nejvetsi pravdepodobnosti potrebuje vetsi nebo druhy HDD

Napsal petrx;887221

Při každém bootu se mi defragmentují ty soubory, které Windows v NTFS rozsekaly na víc fragmentů, trvá to jen chvilku. (O&O Defrag a/nebo Puran Defrag)

Napsal petrx;887221

Tipuji spíš na větší RAM a na sanaci stránkovacího souboru.

Napsal trops-sport;887266

Můžete mi doporučit klidně použité PC které zvládne kancelářskou práci, bude možné dělat ve photoshopu, přehrávat videa, používat účetní programy,...

Případně jaké parametry by mělo takové PC mít, abych si mohl na netu vybrat.

Napsal domain;887224

pouzivat dva ruzne defragmentacni softwary je jasna diagnoza

Napsal domain;887294

mne nevadi ze jsi scientolog

• To se dalo od recidivisty čekat.
• Té práci se nedá věřit, napsal ji jen proto, aby ho nevyhodili ze školy.
• Copak může být kouření nezdravé, když tolik doktorů kouří?
• Jsi mladý a nemá smysl o tom tématu s tebou jakkoliv diskutovat!

• Podstatu klamu elegantně vystihuje známá anekdota: USA: Kolik je v SSSR průměrný plat kvalifikovaného dělníka? SSSR: A vy zase bijete černochy!
• Manžel: Opravdu si nemůžeme dovolit norkový kožich. Pracuji dvanáct hodin denně a i tak máme sotva na nájem.
• Manželka: A na tu mladou servírku tehdy před deseti lety jsi peníze měl, co?!

Napsal domain;887299

spojeni O&O a scientologie bylo publikovano

Napsal domain;887299

tva defragmentace je dobra sranda pro ty kteri premysleji

The superior disk management capabilities of NTFS mean that fragmentation is reduced compared to FAT. Unfortunately, this led to a popular myth--that NTFS volumes have no fragmentation, and therefore never need defragmentation. Microsoft unwittingly exacerbated this problem by not providing any utility to defragment NTFS partitions in Windows NT, implying that defragmentation was unnecessary. But this is simply not the case: NTFS partitions definitely are subject to fragmentation. Many users of NTFS have never defragmented their partitions at all, leading to avoidable performance slowdowns over time.

In fact, due to their complexity, NTFS volumes suffer from a variety of different types of fragmentation. Unlike FAT, where a simple cluster allocation system is used, NTFS uses the Master File Table and a combination of resident and non-resident attributes to store files. Due to the flexible way that data is stored, and that additional data storage areas are added as needed, the result can be pieces of data spread out over the volume, particularly when small files grow into large ones. Remember that while NTFS has a much better design than FAT, at its core it does still store data in clusters. The addition and removal of data storage extents causes much of the fragmentation of files and directories. As the MFT grows, it itself can become fragmented, reducing performance further.

NTFS and fragmentation

Before I fall into the typical blog trap of talking about my random ire of the day (night?), I should say something related to VirtualDub. Generally, hard drive partitions that are formatted with NTFS have slightly slower write performance than partitions formatted with the FAT32 file system. If you are doing video capture, or similar manipulation of video files that requires high disk bandwidth, consider using FAT32 instead of NTFS, especially for temporary files for which it isn't a big deal if they are lost in a system failure (if your video capture is interrupted, you're not likely to need the partial file anyway).

Okay, now for ire.

It's fairly well known that the NT file system (NTFS) is very bad at avoiding fragmentation, partly due to its allocation strategy of intentionally placing tiny gaps between files — which is good if those files expand, but bad if they don't. Today, I see this in a fragmentation analysis report of my hard drive:

Fragments File Size Name

111 444KB WINDOWS$NtServicePackUninstall$

The cluster size of the hard drive partition is 4K. This means that NTFS has successfully managed to create a huge directory in which not a single pair of clusters are sequential. I used to think that the Amiga standard file system was bad, but this takes the cake.